COM 320 Small Group Communication

Spring, 2015

 

basketball team

Dr. Marcia D. Dixson

Office: NF 230B 481-6558

dixson@ipfw.edu

Office Hours: MW 2:30 - 4:30 pm and by appointment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reflection Paper Rubric

Content
Category Poor (612-13) Satisfactory (14-15) Good (16-17) Very Good (18-19) Excellent (20)
First concept/theory applied to group member improvment Theory/concept used inappropriately , little/no explanation/support/examples; little/no focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning Theory/concept used, some explanation/support/examples; some focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning Theory/concept used appropriately , specific explanation/support/examples; appropriate focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning Theory/concept used well, specific explanation/support/examples; good focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning Theory/concept used extremely well, specific explanation/support/examples; excellent focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning
Second concept/theory applied to group member improvment Theory/concept used inappropriately , little/no explanation/support/examples; little/no focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning Theory/concept used, some explanation/support/examples; some focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning Theory/concept used appropriately , specific explanation/support/examples; appropriate focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning Theory/concept used well, specific explanation/support/examples; good focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning Theory/concept used extremely well, specific explanation/support/examples; excellent focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning
Third concept/theory applied to group member improvment Theory/concept used inappropriately , little/no explanation/support/examples; little/no focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning Theory/concept used, some explanation/support/examples; some focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning Theory/concept used appropriately , specific explanation/support/examples; appropriate focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning Theory/concept used well, specific explanation/support/examples; good focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning Theory/concept used extremely well, specific explanation/support/examples; excellent focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning
Fourth concept/theory applied to group member improvment Theory/concept used inappropriately , little/no explanation/support/examples; little/no focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning Theory/concept used, some explanation/support/examples; some focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning Theory/concept used appropriately , specific explanation/support/examples; appropriate focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning Theory/concept used well, specific explanation/support/examples; good focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning Theory/concept used extremely well, specific explanation/support/examples; excellent focus on individual improvement or helping group functioning
Writing
  Poor (6) Satisfactory (7) Good (8) Very Good (9) Excellent (10)
Writing Not well organized or supported Somewhat w ell organized/ or well supported/ or good transitions Somewhat well organized, supported with good transitions Mostly well organized, supported with good transitions Well organized, well supported, solid transitions
Editing/Formatting Not 2-4 pp., double-spaced, 1 inch margins, 12 point font, with many grammatical errors or typos Not 2-4 pp., double-spaced, 1 inch margins, 12 point font, with some grammatical errors or typos 2-4 pp., double-spaced, 1 inch margins, 12 point font, many grammatical errors or typos 2-4 pp., double-spaced, 1 inch margins, 12 point font, some grammatical errors or typos 2-4 pp., double-spaced, 1 inch margins, 12 point font, few grammatical errors or typos

Word Version of rubric